EVE Search - Cloaked "Unidentified Structure" mystery

Check My IP Information

All Channels

EVE General Discussion

Cloaked "Unidentified Structure" mystery

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]


Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 1 post(s)
Jenshae Chiroptera The Volition Cult 661	Posted - 2014.12.27 02:52:05 - [1] - Quote I suspect it is going to go something like this: - Sleepers have invaded Jove space and shattered their systems. (Hence the green smudge) - Stars exploded. - Now you, oh so brave EVE pilot must go and destroy the sleepers and help the poor Jovians. - In return you will probably get more ships and weapons to make CCPs job of ever balancing the game more impossible (but hey! Shiny stuff to amuse you for a day or two) Oh, right, the structure. Jovians probably hiding from the sleepers. CSM Ten movement for change. EVE - the only MMO that not so subtly serves up victims. Status: Rabid carebear Blog
Jenshae Chiroptera The Volition Cult 669	Posted - 2014.12.28 18:06:59 - [2] - Quote Solecist Project wrote: You don't get how balancing works at all. For gun boats, you would look at potential damage vs tank. Role balancing becomes more tricky and not even that is right. Tengus have the most EHP with resists, speed and relatively low signature, combined with rails and long range. Tengu: 200K eHP, 233mm, 632m/s, 1359 volley, 412 DPS, 36 000m optimal with anti-matter Loki: 123K eHP, 189mm, 751 m/s, 1994 volley, 260 DPS, 19 000 optimal with EMP So, let us look at the Loki then. The Tengu has 30% less volley but hardly a penalty against the Loki that wants to keep you far away so you can not web it .... but needs to come closer with their longest range weapon. That is just two ships designed as closely as possible to each other. Not even comparing the Tengu against other gun ships. So, who does understand balancing then? I don't think CCP does. CSM Ten movement for change. EVE - the only MMO that not so subtly serves up victims. Status: Rabid carebear Blog
Jenshae Chiroptera The Volition Cult 669	Posted - 2014.12.29 01:31:20 - [3] - Quote Hasikan Miallok wrote: The CCP version of balancing is to make everything end up sort of a mish mash of wishy washy sameness :D Partially and with good reason. Logi -------------Cap stable ---\|\|--- Cap transfer ------ Armour -- Oneiros ------ \|\| --- Guardian --------- Shields - Scimitar -------\|\| --- Basalisk ---------- Each is different in that they are have two factors but not three or all of them and each has a different combination. For the most part, much of the design up to the T2 was rather solid in concept. Now they are handing out powerful abilities like being nullified to frigates and .... what the hell is with T3 destroyers? Looking at EVE one way, you could say it has a balance of predators and prey. Some predators fight over the best hunting grounds but there is still a problem; CCP is constantly giving better toys to the predators and when they hit a point of being too successful, there will be a shift, probably a massive cascade (if they reach it), where miners, industrials and such just unsubscribe, for the most part quietly. Supplies will drop, prices will rise and the whining while hit levels unheard of before. Then CCP will have the option to either seed all stations with NPC goods that players can just buy or leave it to the players to force the lower ranking predators into taking the roles of prey to keep prices down. CSM Ten movement for change. EVE - the only MMO that not so subtly serves up victims. Status: Rabid carebear Blog
Jenshae Chiroptera The Volition Cult 675	Posted - 2014.12.30 04:34:45 - [4] - Quote Jenshae Chiroptera wrote: Looking at EVE one way, you could say it has a balance of predators and prey. Some predators fight over the best hunting grounds but there is still a problem; CCP is constantly giving better toys to the predators and when they hit a point of being too successful, there will be a shift, probably a massive cascade (if they reach it), where miners, industrials and such just unsubscribe, for the most part quietly. Supplies will drop, prices will rise and the whining while hit levels unheard of before. Then CCP will have the option to either seed all stations with NPC goods that players can just buy or leave it to the players to force the lower ranking predators into taking the roles of prey to keep prices down. This news post on carebear conservation seems far too coincidental CSM Ten movement for change. EVE - the only MMO that not so subtly serves up victims. Status: Rabid carebear Blog
Jenshae Chiroptera The Volition Cult 740	Posted - 2015.01.09 02:34:19 - [5] - Quote Abrazzar wrote: Iyokus Patrouette wrote: This is just the latest weapon in the AFK cloakers war on Null bears. Do not be afraid. . unless you're a null bear, then post about how unfair it is on the forums. You just wait and see yourself back in the clone bay while on a long AFK cloaking session because the Sleepers took offence at you impersonating one of their cloaked structures. It was a footage from high sec. Don't tell me talk of such wonderful possibilities. Sleepers killing off AFK cloakers? Too good to be true. CSM Ten movement for change. CCP - Building ant hills and magnifying glasses for fat kids. Status: Rabid carebear Blog
Jenshae Chiroptera The Volition Cult 744	Posted - 2015.01.10 00:37:27 - [6] - Quote Herzog Wolfhammer wrote: So... could this be the cure for AFK cloakers? Would they notice? CSM Ten movement for change. CCP - Building ant hills and magnifying glasses for fat kids. Status: Rabid carebear Blog
Jenshae Chiroptera The Volition Cult 744	Posted - 2015.01.10 14:55:15 - [7] - Quote Solops Crendraven wrote: What all this about UFOs Sorry CUSs Mystery?being Violated And Invaded. Though I wouldn't Mind having one of those Jovian Motherships ... because just when Titans are starting to be curtailed a bit, what we need is another over powered ship to drop on people? If they do give us Jovian stuff I hope it is powerful but an absolute nuisance to use. "You have this mother ship but do not have the technology to make it move." Have to keep packing it up and moving it in a Titan / Carrier / Jump Freighter and then assemble it on the battle field. (So only when you are expecting the enemy to land on you soon and then you can't go anywhere as you can't extract it) CSM Ten movement for change. CCP - Building ant hills and magnifying glasses for fat kids. Status: Rabid carebear Blog
Jenshae Chiroptera The Volition Cult 747	Posted - 2015.01.10 22:53:04 - [8] - Quote Herzog Wolfhammer wrote: I believe ultimately this stiff is "precursor content" to the needs of player-made stargates as later content, or some advanced means of travel. Possibly by the time it comes to fruition the present mechanics of travel and the status quo around it will be so nerfed as to be unrecognizable, but the mastery of the new means will put those who put in the effort at a greater advantage over those who do not. Can you imagine one way gates? A builds gate in Q that links to Y B who lives in Y has no link to Q so they have to either take worm holes or build a gate to stop A invading them. C makes gates to all systems in range and keeps blowing the ones made that links to their system. They cyno home after they do this. CSM Ten movement for change. CCP - Building ant hills and magnifying glasses for fat kids. Status: Rabid carebear Blog
Jenshae Chiroptera The Volition Cult 757	Posted - 2015.01.14 02:45:38 - [9] - Quote TheSmokingHertog wrote: This is great against botters ;)... How much PVP have you done against botters? Seen Tier 3 BCs volley with perfect timing or logi repairing perfectly? They would only need to pre-configure accordingly. CSM Ten movement for change. CCP - Building ant hills and magnifying glasses for fat kids. Status: Rabid carebear Blog
Jenshae Chiroptera The Volition Cult 757	Posted - 2015.01.14 15:16:52 - [10] - Quote Abrazzar wrote: I already see Circadian Sleepers outdoing CODE. in high-sec afk miner kills. Anything or anyone that makes a concerted effort could out do CODE. Remember the Goons ice embargos? CSM Ten movement for change. CCP - Building ant hills and magnifying glasses for fat kids. Status: Rabid carebear Blog

Jenshae Chiroptera The Volition Cult 759	Posted - 2015.01.17 17:57:37 - [11] - Quote TheSmokingHertog wrote: After googling I found this < does it help? Excellent link! CSM Ten movement for change. CCP - Building ant hills and magnifying glasses for fat kids. Status: Rabid carebear Blog
Jenshae Chiroptera The Volition Cult 846	Posted - 2015.02.01 21:52:42 - [12] - Quote So, what are the encounters like with the sleepers now that they have patched them in? CSM Ten movement for change. CCP - Building ant hills and magnifying glasses for fat kids. Status: Rabid carebear Blog
Jenshae Chiroptera The Volition Cult 856	Posted - 2015.02.03 16:16:47 - [13] - Quote Abrazzar wrote: Finally a station in appropriate dimensions.. Yes! More please! CSM Ten movement for change. CCP - Building ant hills and magnifying glasses for fat kids. Status: Rabid carebear Blog
Jenshae Chiroptera The Volition Cult 870	Posted - 2015.02.08 01:54:54 - [14] - Quote Goatman NotMyFault wrote: someone whisperd me.... Jove is the solution to end the nullsec sovereignty ownership. If an alliance holds too many systems, they cant fight and controll every system. So Jove will shoot Down the TCU and take over the system. This will give many a chance to grab themselves a little piece of nullsec instead of renting it from big alliances, if they can fight off Jove and put up their own TCU. This will hit the big alliances hard that controll entier regions.... Trying to take away systems won't work entirely. They need to be able to consolodate. CSM Ten movement for change. CCP - Building ant hills and magnifying glasses for fat kids. Status: Rabid carebear Blog
Jenshae Chiroptera The Volition Cult 872	Posted - 2015.02.09 01:06:06 - [15] - Quote Goatman NotMyFault wrote: Eugene Kerner wrote: Are their locations fix? Do they despawn? I always stumble over them when I jump out of Thera (test server). Is their number increasing? How many are there? Did someone start to map them? Edit: Seems like every constellation has at least one? I fly daily around in null... and i see those structures in approx. every 4-6 system apart. From my point of view, ive only seen them in systems without stations. I drove Down from hi-sec to Outer regions few days ago, and these structures pops up on overview very often as fast i enter nullsec. Tho i cant speak for sightings in low or hisec. Have them in a low activity system that has a station. CSM Ten movement for change. CCP - Building ant hills and magnifying glasses for fat kids. Status: Rabid carebear Blog
Jenshae Chiroptera The Volition Cult 1027	Posted - 2015.03.03 15:23:53 - [16] - Quote So ... these Drifters? CSM Ten movement for change. CCP - Building ant hills and magnifying glasses for fat kids. Status: Rabid carebear Blog
Jenshae Chiroptera The Volition Cult 1027	Posted - 2015.03.03 19:03:31 - [17] - Quote kraken11 jensen wrote: Jenshae Chiroptera wrote: So ... these Drifters? They're Jovians, look where the HQ is. its in jove Space. I was helping this interesting thread to stand up again and you kicked it back down. CSM Ten movement for change. CCP - Building ant hills and magnifying glasses for fat kids. Status: Rabid carebear Blog

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.